<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (5) TMI 15 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld duty demands uncontested by the appellants but set aside confiscation orders, redemption fines, and penalties on the company and its officers. The judgment emphasized the absence of evidence supporting duty evasion intentions and the acceptance of explanations for discrepancies in stock and scrap management practices.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40884" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (5) TMI 15 - CESTAT,MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld duty demands uncontested by the appellants but set aside confiscation orders, redemption fines, and penalties on the company and its officers. The judgment emphasized the absence of evidence supporting duty evasion intentions and the acceptance of explanations for discrepancies in stock and scrap management practices.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>