https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1472 Criminal prosecution for cheating, forgery, conspiracy and use of another person's passport was found maintainable where the record showed a coordinated import scheme using bank accounts, passports and bills of entry with fictitious or tampered particulars. The court applied the charge-framing standard of grave suspicion and held that, at that stage, it was not required to conduct a detailed trial. Exoneration in customs adjudication proceedings did not bar criminal proceedings because the factual foundation for the penal allegations remained on record. The order framing charges was therefore upheld and the revision rejected. en-us Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1472 Criminal prosecution for cheating, forgery, conspiracy and use of another person's passport was found maintainable where the record showed a coordinated import scheme using bank accounts, passports and bills of entry with fictitious or tampered particulars. The court applied the charge-framing standard of grave suspicion and held that, at that stage, it was not required to conduct a detailed trial. Exoneration in customs adjudication proceedings did not bar criminal proceedings because the factual foundation for the penal allegations remained on record. The order framing charges was therefore upheld and the revision rejected. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 28 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1472