<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>High Court Overturns Penalty on Three for Duty Evasion; Lack of Evidence Violated Rule 26, Central Excise Rules 2002.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26361</link>
    <description>Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by the manufacturer - the requisite evidence necessary for levy of penalty on each of the Appellants under Rule 26 of the CE Rules 2002 was not brought on record by the Department - no penalty - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:21:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408821" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>High Court Overturns Penalty on Three for Duty Evasion; Lack of Evidence Violated Rule 26, Central Excise Rules 2002.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26361</link>
      <description>Imposition of personal penalty on 3 persons for duty evasion by the manufacturer - the requisite evidence necessary for levy of penalty on each of the Appellants under Rule 26 of the CE Rules 2002 was not brought on record by the Department - no penalty - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 14:21:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26361</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>