<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269306</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s adoption of the stamp duty value as the fair market value under section 50C, emphasizing the importance of providing evidence to challenge the DVO&#039;s valuation. The decision highlighted the procedural requirements and the Assessing Officer&#039;s obligation to follow statutory provisions and tribunal directions in computing capital gains on property sales. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to confirm the fair market value as per section 50C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 13:07:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408784" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 610 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269306</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer&#039;s adoption of the stamp duty value as the fair market value under section 50C, emphasizing the importance of providing evidence to challenge the DVO&#039;s valuation. The decision highlighted the procedural requirements and the Assessing Officer&#039;s obligation to follow statutory provisions and tribunal directions in computing capital gains on property sales. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order to confirm the fair market value as per section 50C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>