<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 600 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269296</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand on the petitioner for works contract services provided for various projects, including infrastructure for Delhi University, APMC, and Road Transport Corporations. The petitioner disputed the remaining liability, claiming immunity for services related to Commonwealth Games and Road Transport Corporations. The Tribunal denied the exclusion for APMC services, stating they further business and commerce. A waiver of predeposit and stay of proceedings were granted, with the petitioner required to remit Rs. 80 lakhs within four weeks. Failure to comply would dissolve the stay and dismiss the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2016 11:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408773" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 600 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269296</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed a service tax demand on the petitioner for works contract services provided for various projects, including infrastructure for Delhi University, APMC, and Road Transport Corporations. The petitioner disputed the remaining liability, claiming immunity for services related to Commonwealth Games and Road Transport Corporations. The Tribunal denied the exclusion for APMC services, stating they further business and commerce. A waiver of predeposit and stay of proceedings were granted, with the petitioner required to remit Rs. 80 lakhs within four weeks. Failure to comply would dissolve the stay and dismiss the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269296</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>