https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269289 The court dismissed the appeals challenging the CESTAT's decision to set aside most demands and penalties related to alleged clandestine removal of goods by Vishnu & Co. Pvt. Ltd. The court upheld the CESTAT's findings on the insufficiency of evidence, questioned the reliability of reports, and confirmed the CESTAT's decisions on confiscation and redemption fines. Emphasizing limited jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, the court found no legal errors in the CESTAT's order and dismissed the appeals, noting the absence of substantial legal questions. en-us Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 May 2016 11:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269289 The court dismissed the appeals challenging the CESTAT's decision to set aside most demands and penalties related to alleged clandestine removal of goods by Vishnu & Co. Pvt. Ltd. The court upheld the CESTAT's findings on the insufficiency of evidence, questioned the reliability of reports, and confirmed the CESTAT's decisions on confiscation and redemption fines. Emphasizing limited jurisdiction under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, the court found no legal errors in the CESTAT's order and dismissed the appeals, noting the absence of substantial legal questions. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 02 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269289