<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 587 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269283</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders finding the appellant violated certain regulations under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulation 2004. However, the Tribunal modified the revocation period of the CHA License, making it effective until 31/3/2016, and ordered the restoration of the license and security deposit from 1/4/2016, considering the penalty&#039;s proportionality.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2017 14:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408757" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 587 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269283</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the orders finding the appellant violated certain regulations under the Customs House Agents Licensing Regulation 2004. However, the Tribunal modified the revocation period of the CHA License, making it effective until 31/3/2016, and ordered the restoration of the license and security deposit from 1/4/2016, considering the penalty&#039;s proportionality.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>