<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269281</link>
    <description>Customs valuation of customised related-party goods turned on two points: fresh factual grounds not raised before the adjudicating authority or Commissioner (Appeals) could not be introduced for the first time before the Tribunal, so the Revenue&#039;s additional objections were not maintainable; and, where the goods were customised and no contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods were available, comparison with such imports was unnecessary. On those facts, the declared transaction value was accepted and the valuation challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2016 15:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 585 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269281</link>
      <description>Customs valuation of customised related-party goods turned on two points: fresh factual grounds not raised before the adjudicating authority or Commissioner (Appeals) could not be introduced for the first time before the Tribunal, so the Revenue&#039;s additional objections were not maintainable; and, where the goods were customised and no contemporaneous imports of identical or similar goods were available, comparison with such imports was unnecessary. On those facts, the declared transaction value was accepted and the valuation challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>