<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 584 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license due to serious violations of the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004 by the appellant. The penalty of revocation was deemed appropriate considering the appellant&#039;s failure to obtain authorization, dealings with a non-existent exporter, and lack of due diligence. The judgment emphasized that the punishment should be proportionate to the misconduct, and in this case, revocation was justified based on the severity of the violations. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no issues with the impugned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408752" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 584 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the revocation of the Customs House Agent (CHA) license due to serious violations of the Customs House Agent Licensing Regulations, 2004 by the appellant. The penalty of revocation was deemed appropriate considering the appellant&#039;s failure to obtain authorization, dealings with a non-existent exporter, and lack of due diligence. The judgment emphasized that the punishment should be proportionate to the misconduct, and in this case, revocation was justified based on the severity of the violations. The appeal was dismissed as the Tribunal found no issues with the impugned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>