<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269276</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reject appeals as time-barred due to a delay in filing. The Tribunal found that the delay was primarily caused by the delayed receipt of the Order-in-Original and not due to intentional actions by the appellant. As the appeal was filed within the limitation period from the actual receipt of the order, the Tribunal remanded the matter for a decision on merits, emphasizing the significance of timely communication and the impact of procedural delays on appeal timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 580 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269276</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI set aside the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to reject appeals as time-barred due to a delay in filing. The Tribunal found that the delay was primarily caused by the delayed receipt of the Order-in-Original and not due to intentional actions by the appellant. As the appeal was filed within the limitation period from the actual receipt of the order, the Tribunal remanded the matter for a decision on merits, emphasizing the significance of timely communication and the impact of procedural delays on appeal timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>