<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 579 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269275</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE granted a stay of the operation of the Order-in-Appeal, enabling the appellant to await the final decision on the appeals. This decision was made in light of the discrepancy between the method of duty payment and the contractual payment terms, leading to the conclusion that the excess duty paid was eligible for a refund. The Tribunal found that the duty liability should not apply to goods not actually exported and that the duty incidence had not been transferred to the overseas buyer as per the purchase contract.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408744" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 579 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269275</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT BANGALORE granted a stay of the operation of the Order-in-Appeal, enabling the appellant to await the final decision on the appeals. This decision was made in light of the discrepancy between the method of duty payment and the contractual payment terms, leading to the conclusion that the excess duty paid was eligible for a refund. The Tribunal found that the duty liability should not apply to goods not actually exported and that the duty incidence had not been transferred to the overseas buyer as per the purchase contract.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269275</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>