<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 575 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269271</link>
    <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned revised assessment orders for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The respondent was directed to schedule a personal hearing for the petitioner to submit documentary evidence regarding the disputed sale of plant, machinery, and vehicles. Upon presentation of proof, the respondent was instructed to pass fresh orders based on merit and in compliance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the matters were closed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:03:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 575 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269271</link>
      <description>The court allowed the writ petitions, setting aside the impugned revised assessment orders for assessment years 2007-08 and 2008-09. The respondent was directed to schedule a personal hearing for the petitioner to submit documentary evidence regarding the disputed sale of plant, machinery, and vehicles. Upon presentation of proof, the respondent was instructed to pass fresh orders based on merit and in compliance with the law. No costs were awarded, and the matters were closed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>