https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269267 Increase in authorised share capital and any related stamp duty relief were left to the competent authorities' statutory discretion rather than decided on merits. For the share-capital filing issue, the authorities were to consider the writ materials and pass a reasoned decision within three months. For stamp duty, the State's power to reduce, remit or compound duty was noted, but no application had been made at that stage; any application was to be considered in accordance with law within three months. The writ petition was thus disposed of with directions for administrative consideration, leaving the wider issues open. en-us Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 04 Nov 2015 17:15:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269267 Increase in authorised share capital and any related stamp duty relief were left to the competent authorities' statutory discretion rather than decided on merits. For the share-capital filing issue, the authorities were to consider the writ materials and pass a reasoned decision within three months. For stamp duty, the State's power to reduce, remit or compound duty was noted, but no application had been made at that stage; any application was to be considered in accordance with law within three months. The writ petition was thus disposed of with directions for administrative consideration, leaving the wider issues open. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 28 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269267