<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 66 -  CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1462</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand and interest imposed. The authorities were directed to dispose of the goods in accordance with Section 48 of the Customs Act. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that the demand made under the impugned order was not sustainable in light of the legal provisions governing the situation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40873" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 66 -  CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1462</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the duty demand and interest imposed. The authorities were directed to dispose of the goods in accordance with Section 48 of the Customs Act. The appeal was allowed on the grounds that the demand made under the impugned order was not sustainable in light of the legal provisions governing the situation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1462</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>