<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 64 -  CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1459</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confirm duty demand against the appellants for importing insulated electrical cable lengths as components for ECG machines but using them as spares/warranty replacements. The appellants&#039; argument that the components were intended for ECG machine manufacture and later sold as spares was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the denial of exemption benefits under Notification No. 165/86-Cus. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s invocation of the extended period for duty demand, emphasizing strict compliance with Notification conditions and dismissing the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 64 -  CESTAT,BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1459</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confirm duty demand against the appellants for importing insulated electrical cable lengths as components for ECG machines but using them as spares/warranty replacements. The appellants&#039; argument that the components were intended for ECG machine manufacture and later sold as spares was deemed unsubstantiated, leading to the denial of exemption benefits under Notification No. 165/86-Cus. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner&#039;s invocation of the extended period for duty demand, emphasizing strict compliance with Notification conditions and dismissing the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1459</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>