<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 63 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS),MANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1455</link>
    <description>The appeal was successful as the Commissioner set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner found that the delay in payment of duty was due to a genuine belief that the services rendered were not taxable, especially during a pending decision. Previous orders where penalties were set aside for similar issues were considered, leading to the conclusion that there was no reason to uphold the penalty in this case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 18:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 63 - COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE (APPEALS),MANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1455</link>
      <description>The appeal was successful as the Commissioner set aside the penalty imposed under Section 76 of the Finance Act, 1994. The Commissioner found that the delay in payment of duty was due to a genuine belief that the services rendered were not taxable, especially during a pending decision. Previous orders where penalties were set aside for similar issues were considered, leading to the conclusion that there was no reason to uphold the penalty in this case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>