<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (3) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176092</link>
    <description>The High Court granted specific performance of a contract of sale for a property in New Delhi, directing the vendor to reapply for permission within a specified timeframe. The Court also awarded damages in case permission was refused. The Court upheld the decision, emphasizing the completed nature of the contract subject to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s sanction and the parties&#039; agreement to be bound by the terms. The appellant&#039;s argument that the contract was contingent was dismissed, and the Court rejected additional pleas not raised in the High Court, stressing the importance of presenting all relevant issues at the appropriate stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 18:10:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408608" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (3) TMI 60 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176092</link>
      <description>The High Court granted specific performance of a contract of sale for a property in New Delhi, directing the vendor to reapply for permission within a specified timeframe. The Court also awarded damages in case permission was refused. The Court upheld the decision, emphasizing the completed nature of the contract subject to the Chief Commissioner&#039;s sanction and the parties&#039; agreement to be bound by the terms. The appellant&#039;s argument that the contract was contingent was dismissed, and the Court rejected additional pleas not raised in the High Court, stressing the importance of presenting all relevant issues at the appropriate stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>