<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1449</link>
    <description>The appeal challenging the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties for the period September 1999 to March 2000 was dismissed. However, the appeal regarding the subsequent period of April to September 2000 was allowed to the extent of excluding certain expenses from the taxable service value. The original authority was instructed to reassess the tax amount differentials and penalties imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40860" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 34 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1449</link>
      <description>The appeal challenging the demand of service tax, interest, and penalties for the period September 1999 to March 2000 was dismissed. However, the appeal regarding the subsequent period of April to September 2000 was allowed to the extent of excluding certain expenses from the taxable service value. The original authority was instructed to reassess the tax amount differentials and penalties imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1449</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>