<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 742 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176089</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application and appeal in a case involving the levy of Service Tax on consumable inputs used in photography. The Tribunal considered legal precedents, including a previous judgment, a subsequent clarification by the Board, and an Apex Court judgment. It found that the issue was settled in the assessee&#039;s favor in a similar case, leading to the decision to grant the stay application and appeal, along with any consequential relief, based on the cited judgments and the settled nature of the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 17:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408597" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 742 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176089</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the stay application and appeal in a case involving the levy of Service Tax on consumable inputs used in photography. The Tribunal considered legal precedents, including a previous judgment, a subsequent clarification by the Board, and an Apex Court judgment. It found that the issue was settled in the assessee&#039;s favor in a similar case, leading to the decision to grant the stay application and appeal, along with any consequential relief, based on the cited judgments and the settled nature of the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176089</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>