<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (2) TMI 686 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176085</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass an available industrial dispute mechanism where the controversy turns on unresolved questions of fact. The High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition because the dispute required evidence and fact-finding by the statutory forum. On abandonment of service, continued unauthorised absence under a certified standing order may support a presumption that the workman left service, but disputed issues such as whether the workmen were on strike and whether the standing order procedure was followed had to be decided by the appropriate forum. The termination could not be invalidated in writ proceedings on the material before the High Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2017 17:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408591" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (2) TMI 686 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176085</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction should not ordinarily be used to bypass an available industrial dispute mechanism where the controversy turns on unresolved questions of fact. The High Court erred in entertaining the writ petition because the dispute required evidence and fact-finding by the statutory forum. On abandonment of service, continued unauthorised absence under a certified standing order may support a presumption that the workman left service, but disputed issues such as whether the workmen were on strike and whether the standing order procedure was followed had to be decided by the appropriate forum. The termination could not be invalidated in writ proceedings on the material before the High Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>