https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176080 Article 226 relief should ordinarily not be used where an adequate statutory alternative remedy exists, including an appeal to the Collector under Section 18 of the Revenue Book Circular. The text also notes that, when a matter is remitted to the original authority, that authority must act under the governing rules and regulations, and should not be subjected to personal summons to explain alleged misconduct. Any challenge to the Nazul Officer's refusal of an NOC on the basis of missing documents should be pursued through the prescribed appellate mechanism rather than contempt proceedings or direct writ interference. en-us Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Dec 2015 09:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176080 Article 226 relief should ordinarily not be used where an adequate statutory alternative remedy exists, including an appeal to the Collector under Section 18 of the Revenue Book Circular. The text also notes that, when a matter is remitted to the original authority, that authority must act under the governing rules and regulations, and should not be subjected to personal summons to explain alleged misconduct. Any challenge to the Nazul Officer's refusal of an NOC on the basis of missing documents should be pursued through the prescribed appellate mechanism rather than contempt proceedings or direct writ interference. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 23 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176080