<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (12) TMI 613 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176063</link>
    <description>A rejection of remission of duty claim arising from fire damage was held unsustainable where no notice proposing rejection was issued, no opportunity of hearing was afforded, and no reasons were recorded. The proper course was to set aside the rejection and remand the matter for fresh consideration after giving the assessee a reasonable hearing and passing a reasoned order before adjudicating the pending demand notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408560" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (12) TMI 613 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176063</link>
      <description>A rejection of remission of duty claim arising from fire damage was held unsustainable where no notice proposing rejection was issued, no opportunity of hearing was afforded, and no reasons were recorded. The proper course was to set aside the rejection and remand the matter for fresh consideration after giving the assessee a reasonable hearing and passing a reasoned order before adjudicating the pending demand notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Dec 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>