https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176061 The article explains that detention grounds were held sufficiently specific where the communication, read as a whole, identified the alleged activities, locality, period, incidents relied on, and the public-interest basis for limited disclosure, enabling an effective representation. It also states that section 3(3) was construed as a supervisory reporting provision requiring prompt transmission of the materials forming the basis of the detention order to the State Government, while section 7 served the separate purpose of informing detenus of the grounds. On that reading, the report under section 3(3) need not duplicate the formal grounds later supplied to detenus. en-us Mon, 17 Sep 1956 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 14:03:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176061 The article explains that detention grounds were held sufficiently specific where the communication, read as a whole, identified the alleged activities, locality, period, incidents relied on, and the public-interest basis for limited disclosure, enabling an effective representation. It also states that section 3(3) was construed as a supervisory reporting provision requiring prompt transmission of the materials forming the basis of the detention order to the State Government, while section 7 served the separate purpose of informing detenus of the grounds. On that reading, the report under section 3(3) need not duplicate the formal grounds later supplied to detenus. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 17 Sep 1956 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176061