<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176058</link>
    <description>The statutory power to prohibit and abolish contract labour under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 remains with the appropriate Government under Section 10, and a Labour Court or writ court cannot itself order abolition or absorption merely because the work is perennial. At the same time, an industrial adjudicator may examine whether a contract arrangement is a sham or camouflage, because a fictitious contract may reveal a direct employment relationship with the principal employer. Workmen cannot advance mutually destructive stands by asserting both contract labour status and direct employment, and inconsistent later pleadings cannot displace earlier admissions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408555" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 544 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176058</link>
      <description>The statutory power to prohibit and abolish contract labour under the Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 remains with the appropriate Government under Section 10, and a Labour Court or writ court cannot itself order abolition or absorption merely because the work is perennial. At the same time, an industrial adjudicator may examine whether a contract arrangement is a sham or camouflage, because a fictitious contract may reveal a direct employment relationship with the principal employer. Workmen cannot advance mutually destructive stands by asserting both contract labour status and direct employment, and inconsistent later pleadings cannot displace earlier admissions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>