https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176059 The Supreme Court upheld the appellate court's decision in a case involving damages for conversion, determining that the plaintiffs did not have title to the goods claimed. The relationship between the parties was found to be that of principal and principal, not agent and principal. The court held that the introduction of the licence system and "Lease and Lend" scheme did not alter this relationship. The plaintiffs were allowed to amend the plaint to include a claim for breach of contract, leading to the suit being remanded for rehearing to the trial court. The appeal was allowed, the decree set aside, and costs were allocated accordingly. en-us Tue, 22 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:46:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176059 The Supreme Court upheld the appellate court's decision in a case involving damages for conversion, determining that the plaintiffs did not have title to the goods claimed. The relationship between the parties was found to be that of principal and principal, not agent and principal. The court held that the introduction of the licence system and "Lease and Lend" scheme did not alter this relationship. The plaintiffs were allowed to amend the plaint to include a claim for breach of contract, leading to the suit being remanded for rehearing to the trial court. The appeal was allowed, the decree set aside, and costs were allocated accordingly. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Jan 1957 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176059