https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176056 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to reject the defendants' application to amend their written statement, specifically paragraphs 25 and 26, as it aimed to introduce a completely new case and prejudice the plaintiff by disallowing the use of previous admissions. The defendants' proposed amendments to other paragraphs were also rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The defendants were advised to apply for the framing of issues if needed, with costs of the appeal to be borne by them, and the record was directed to be returned to the trial court. en-us Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:12:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176056 The High Court upheld the trial court's decision to reject the defendants' application to amend their written statement, specifically paragraphs 25 and 26, as it aimed to introduce a completely new case and prejudice the plaintiff by disallowing the use of previous admissions. The defendants' proposed amendments to other paragraphs were also rejected, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The defendants were advised to apply for the framing of issues if needed, with costs of the appeal to be borne by them, and the record was directed to be returned to the trial court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 23 Sep 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176056