<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (12) TMI 55 -  CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1444</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, upholding the initial penalty of Rs. 2,000 imposed by the adjudicating authority for delayed payment of service tax. The tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty of Rs. 17,284 imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, considering the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of the service tax before the show cause notice and the bona fide manner in which the newly registered firm had acted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40855" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (12) TMI 55 -  CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1444</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, upholding the initial penalty of Rs. 2,000 imposed by the adjudicating authority for delayed payment of service tax. The tribunal set aside the enhanced penalty of Rs. 17,284 imposed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, considering the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of the service tax before the show cause notice and the bona fide manner in which the newly registered firm had acted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1444</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>