https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055 Preventive detention orders were said to be vulnerable where the detaining authority did not address whether the seized substance was Ketamine or Ketamine Hydrochloride and did not consider the legal effect of the export notification on the substance actually identified. The orders were also found defective because a relied-upon shipping bill and complete weighment records were not supplied, impairing the detenus' effective right to make a representation. A further material discrepancy between the declared and actual number of bags in the container, left unexplained and unsupported by complete records, was treated as showing non-application of mind. The note states that such omissions vitiate detention. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055 Preventive detention orders were said to be vulnerable where the detaining authority did not address whether the seized substance was Ketamine or Ketamine Hydrochloride and did not consider the legal effect of the export notification on the substance actually identified. The orders were also found defective because a relied-upon shipping bill and complete weighment records were not supplied, impairing the detenus' effective right to make a representation. A further material discrepancy between the declared and actual number of bags in the container, left unexplained and unsupported by complete records, was treated as showing non-application of mind. The note states that such omissions vitiate detention. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055