https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055 Preventive detention orders were vitiated by uncertainty over whether the seized substance was Ketamine or Ketamine Hydrochloride, where the applicable export notification referred only to Ketamine and the legal effect of the distinction was not examined. Non-supply of the relied-upon shipping bill and incomplete or unclear weighment records also impaired the detenus' constitutional right to make an effective representation. A material discrepancy between the declared and recovered number of bags, without clarification from customs officials or complete supporting statements, further demonstrated non-application of mind. The detenus were entitled to release unless required in another matter. en-us Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 13:11:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055 Preventive detention orders were vitiated by uncertainty over whether the seized substance was Ketamine or Ketamine Hydrochloride, where the applicable export notification referred only to Ketamine and the legal effect of the distinction was not examined. Non-supply of the relied-upon shipping bill and incomplete or unclear weighment records also impaired the detenus' constitutional right to make an effective representation. A material discrepancy between the declared and recovered number of bags, without clarification from customs officials or complete supporting statements, further demonstrated non-application of mind. The detenus were entitled to release unless required in another matter. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176055