<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 47 - CESTAT,AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1443</link>
    <description>A further remand on limitation and unjust enrichment was found unwarranted where the refund had already been reconsidered, sanctioned and paid after an earlier remand. The tribunal noted that the department had not issued any recovery notice for the alleged erroneous refund within the prescribed time, and that sending the matter back again would only prolong a dispute pending for more than two decades. The remand was not sustained, the appeal was allowed, and the refund position remained affirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 47 - CESTAT,AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1443</link>
      <description>A further remand on limitation and unjust enrichment was found unwarranted where the refund had already been reconsidered, sanctioned and paid after an earlier remand. The tribunal noted that the department had not issued any recovery notice for the alleged erroneous refund within the prescribed time, and that sending the matter back again would only prolong a dispute pending for more than two decades. The remand was not sustained, the appeal was allowed, and the refund position remained affirmed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>