https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176047 Prior statements made by a party, once proved, constitute substantive evidence of the admitted facts under the Indian Evidence Act. The requirement to confront a witness with a previous statement under Section 145 applies to using prior inconsistent statements for contradiction, not to proving admissions by a party. Accordingly, admissions concerning the character of disputed properties may be relied on without prior confrontation in the witness box. Concurrent findings based on such admissions remain sustainable where no sufficient basis establishes prejudice or displaces those findings. en-us Tue, 30 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:34:11 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176047 Prior statements made by a party, once proved, constitute substantive evidence of the admitted facts under the Indian Evidence Act. The requirement to confront a witness with a previous statement under Section 145 applies to using prior inconsistent statements for contradiction, not to proving admissions by a party. Accordingly, admissions concerning the character of disputed properties may be relied on without prior confrontation in the witness box. Concurrent findings based on such admissions remain sustainable where no sufficient basis establishes prejudice or displaces those findings. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 30 Oct 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176047