https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176042 Concurrent findings that the wife had treated the husband with cruelty were based on evidence of ill-treatment and medical examination after assault, so no legal error justified interference with the factual finding. The Court also held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; adding such a ground is a legislative function, not a judicial one. Divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B was unavailable because both parties did not agree. The appeal therefore failed. en-us Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 Dec 2015 10:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176042 Concurrent findings that the wife had treated the husband with cruelty were based on evidence of ill-treatment and medical examination after assault, so no legal error justified interference with the factual finding. The Court also held that irretrievable breakdown of marriage is not a ground for divorce under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; adding such a ground is a legislative function, not a judicial one. Divorce by mutual consent under Section 13B was unavailable because both parties did not agree. The appeal therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176042