<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Dispute Over Depreciation: AO Misinterprets &quot;180 Days&quot; as &quot;6 Months&quot; for Asset Use Requirement.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26350</link>
    <description>Disallowance of depreciation - The expression &quot;put to use&quot; for 180 days has been wrongly changed by the AO for &quot;6 months&quot; - asset was put to use on or before 30.09.2007, thus the asset for which depreciation claimed was used for a period of more than 180 days - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:40:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:40:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408522" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Dispute Over Depreciation: AO Misinterprets &quot;180 Days&quot; as &quot;6 Months&quot; for Asset Use Requirement.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26350</link>
      <description>Disallowance of depreciation - The expression &quot;put to use&quot; for 180 days has been wrongly changed by the AO for &quot;6 months&quot; - asset was put to use on or before 30.09.2007, thus the asset for which depreciation claimed was used for a period of more than 180 days - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 11:40:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=26350</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>