<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 557 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269253</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held the reassessment to be invalid as it was based on suspicions rather than evidence of income escapement, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of logical reasoning behind reopening assessments, especially in cases where no return of income had been filed. The reassessment was deemed unjustified, and the grounds related to the merits of the addition were not adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408485" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 557 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269253</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held the reassessment to be invalid as it was based on suspicions rather than evidence of income escapement, leading to the allowance of the assessee&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of logical reasoning behind reopening assessments, especially in cases where no return of income had been filed. The reassessment was deemed unjustified, and the grounds related to the merits of the addition were not adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269253</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>