<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 554 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269250</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored that of the A.O., allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and affirming the eligibility for depreciation at 50% on new commercial vehicles as per the Rules. The Tribunal found that the Principal CIT erred in denying the valid claim for depreciation and emphasized the importance of factual accuracy and legal adherence in such decisions to ensure legitimate claims are rightfully allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 554 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269250</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Principal CIT&#039;s order under section 263 and restored that of the A.O., allowing the assessee&#039;s appeal and affirming the eligibility for depreciation at 50% on new commercial vehicles as per the Rules. The Tribunal found that the Principal CIT erred in denying the valid claim for depreciation and emphasized the importance of factual accuracy and legal adherence in such decisions to ensure legitimate claims are rightfully allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>