<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 544 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269240</link>
    <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on car insurance premiums where the vehicles were company-owned, the premium was paid by the assessee, and the cars were used for both directors&#039; travel and official business purposes. The service was considered to have a sufficient nexus with business activity, so insurance of such vehicles qualified as an input service. On that basis, the disallowance was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 544 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269240</link>
      <description>Cenvat credit was treated as admissible on car insurance premiums where the vehicles were company-owned, the premium was paid by the assessee, and the cars were used for both directors&#039; travel and official business purposes. The service was considered to have a sufficient nexus with business activity, so insurance of such vehicles qualified as an input service. On that basis, the disallowance was set aside and credit was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>