<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 529 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269225</link>
    <description>Penalty under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act was upheld because the transport documents were found to be ingenuine and supported a concurrent factual finding of attempted tax evasion. The court held that the dealer had moved goods on documents already rejected or returned, with the same quantity reflected despite differing rates and amounts, and found no illegality or perversity in the authorities&#039; conclusions. As the challenge sought only reappraisal of evidence, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:18:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 529 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269225</link>
      <description>Penalty under the Punjab Value Added Tax Act was upheld because the transport documents were found to be ingenuine and supported a concurrent factual finding of attempted tax evasion. The court held that the dealer had moved goods on documents already rejected or returned, with the same quantity reflected despite differing rates and amounts, and found no illegality or perversity in the authorities&#039; conclusions. As the challenge sought only reappraisal of evidence, no substantial question of law arose, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>