https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269219 The court considered a contempt application for willful disobedience of a court order directing a government authority to decide on representations within four months. The opposite party cited legal issues as grounds for not complying with the order, leading to allegations of disobedience. The petitioner argued that the party's failure to issue clarification as directed constituted disobedience. The court scheduled further hearings to address the matter, ensuring it was not left unresolved. en-us Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 01 Jan 2016 18:01:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269219 The court considered a contempt application for willful disobedience of a court order directing a government authority to decide on representations within four months. The opposite party cited legal issues as grounds for not complying with the order, leading to allegations of disobedience. The petitioner argued that the party's failure to issue clarification as directed constituted disobedience. The court scheduled further hearings to address the matter, ensuring it was not left unresolved. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269219