https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269218 The High Court of Karnataka clarified the procedural distinctions between Sections 18 and 19 of the Right to Information Act, emphasizing that Section 19 provides the appropriate remedy for individuals denied information by the Public Information Officer. The Court deemed the complaint under Section 18(1) as not valid, ultimately quashing the related orders without imposing any costs. en-us Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 11 Dec 2015 12:07:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269218 The High Court of Karnataka clarified the procedural distinctions between Sections 18 and 19 of the Right to Information Act, emphasizing that Section 19 provides the appropriate remedy for individuals denied information by the Public Information Officer. The Court deemed the complaint under Section 18(1) as not valid, ultimately quashing the related orders without imposing any costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269218