<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269217</link>
    <description>In rent control revision, the High Court may examine legality, regularity, correctness and propriety of the findings below, but it cannot re-appreciate the evidence as a second first appellate court merely because a different view is possible. Interference is confined to cases of illegality, perversity, misreading, non-consideration of material evidence, unsupported findings, or procedural irregularity. The expressions &quot;legality or propriety&quot;, &quot;regularity, correctness, legality or propriety&quot;, and &quot;legality, regularity or propriety&quot; expand revisional supervision beyond Section 115 CPC, but they do not confer full appellate jurisdiction or authorize a complete rehearing on facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2015 08:17:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408449" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 521 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269217</link>
      <description>In rent control revision, the High Court may examine legality, regularity, correctness and propriety of the findings below, but it cannot re-appreciate the evidence as a second first appellate court merely because a different view is possible. Interference is confined to cases of illegality, perversity, misreading, non-consideration of material evidence, unsupported findings, or procedural irregularity. The expressions &quot;legality or propriety&quot;, &quot;regularity, correctness, legality or propriety&quot;, and &quot;legality, regularity or propriety&quot; expand revisional supervision beyond Section 115 CPC, but they do not confer full appellate jurisdiction or authorize a complete rehearing on facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>