<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 976 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176010</link>
    <description>The Court determined that no substantial question of law arose regarding the depreciation claim of the assessee in relation to vehicles registered in the names of directors instead of the company. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the vehicles were owned by the company and allowed the depreciation claim. The matter was scheduled to be heard along with another Tax Appeal related to the same assessee from a previous year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 12:38:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 976 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176010</link>
      <description>The Court determined that no substantial question of law arose regarding the depreciation claim of the assessee in relation to vehicles registered in the names of directors instead of the company. The Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision that the vehicles were owned by the company and allowed the depreciation claim. The matter was scheduled to be heard along with another Tax Appeal related to the same assessee from a previous year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=176010</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>