<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 44 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1428</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund of duty paid on capital goods. It held that the unit had not completed the necessary formalities to exit the EOU scheme and continued to operate as a 100% EOU, justifying the refund despite the initial denial based on re-bonding provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with the EXIM policy for exiting the EOU scheme and set aside the Revenue&#039;s appeal, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 44 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1428</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the refund of duty paid on capital goods. It held that the unit had not completed the necessary formalities to exit the EOU scheme and continued to operate as a 100% EOU, justifying the refund despite the initial denial based on re-bonding provisions. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with the EXIM policy for exiting the EOU scheme and set aside the Revenue&#039;s appeal, granting relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1428</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>