<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (1) TMI 991 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175996</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court found that Cochin International Airport Ltd.&#039;s decision to award the contract to Air India was not arbitrary, illegal, or violative of natural justice. The Court held that CIAL acted in its financial and overall interest, emphasizing that the state can choose its method for decision-making in commercial transactions. The Court dismissed claims of influence by Air India and the Ministry of Civil Aviation, noting a transparent decision-making process. Additionally, the Court disagreed with the Kerala High Court&#039;s interference, upholding CIAL&#039;s decision to award the contract to Air India and setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 10:27:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (1) TMI 991 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175996</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court found that Cochin International Airport Ltd.&#039;s decision to award the contract to Air India was not arbitrary, illegal, or violative of natural justice. The Court held that CIAL acted in its financial and overall interest, emphasizing that the state can choose its method for decision-making in commercial transactions. The Court dismissed claims of influence by Air India and the Ministry of Civil Aviation, noting a transparent decision-making process. Additionally, the Court disagreed with the Kerala High Court&#039;s interference, upholding CIAL&#039;s decision to award the contract to Air India and setting aside the Division Bench&#039;s judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>