https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1422 The duty demands and confiscations were varied in this case. The duty demand for excess Borax Penta was set aside due to discrepancies in stock records, while the confiscation of Borax Penta was annulled for lack of evidence. Another duty demand was overturned as the relevant invoice was not produced, leading to a remand for reconsideration. The confiscation of Ceramic Glazed Frit/Mixture was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced. A duty demand for raw material shortage was set aside, emphasizing the need for accurate accounts. The penalty was reduced due to sustained charges, with the case remanded for further consideration. en-us Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1422 The duty demands and confiscations were varied in this case. The duty demand for excess Borax Penta was set aside due to discrepancies in stock records, while the confiscation of Borax Penta was annulled for lack of evidence. Another duty demand was overturned as the relevant invoice was not produced, leading to a remand for reconsideration. The confiscation of Ceramic Glazed Frit/Mixture was upheld, but the redemption fine was reduced. A duty demand for raw material shortage was set aside, emphasizing the need for accurate accounts. The penalty was reduced due to sustained charges, with the case remanded for further consideration. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 25 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1422