<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 479 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269175</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case involving the classification of a barge and diving equipment under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found that the diving equipment welded onto the barge was considered as part of &#039;Stores&#039; under the Act, exempting it from duty payment. The appeal by the Department was dismissed, emphasizing that the diving equipment&#039;s usage in the vessel was crucial, irrespective of ownership boundaries. The Court left open the question of the diving equipment&#039;s classification as &#039;Stores&#039; for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2016 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 479 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269175</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) in a case involving the classification of a barge and diving equipment under the Customs Act, 1962. The Court found that the diving equipment welded onto the barge was considered as part of &#039;Stores&#039; under the Act, exempting it from duty payment. The appeal by the Department was dismissed, emphasizing that the diving equipment&#039;s usage in the vessel was crucial, irrespective of ownership boundaries. The Court left open the question of the diving equipment&#039;s classification as &#039;Stores&#039; for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>