<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269171</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit 30,000 within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon this deposit, the remaining penalty amount would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the evidence presented by both parties during the appeal hearing and considered the petitioner&#039;s financial constraints in determining the deposit amount.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:23:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408311" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 475 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269171</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal directed the petitioner to deposit 30,000 within eight weeks and report compliance by a specified date. Upon this deposit, the remaining penalty amount would be waived, and recovery stayed during the appeal process. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of assessing the evidence presented by both parties during the appeal hearing and considered the petitioner&#039;s financial constraints in determining the deposit amount.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269171</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>