<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (12) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269163</link>
    <description>Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies only where the assessee&#039;s own pending case before the assessing authority involves an identical question of law to another pending case of the same assessee before the High Court or Supreme Court; absent such a pending superior-court case, the procedure cannot be invoked and the request for liberty to file a declaration was rejected. A challenge to reassessment under section 19(20) also failed because the provision had already been upheld by a Division Bench, and that binding ruling governed the dispute. The writ petitions were dismissed and the reassessment orders were left intact.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:21:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408303" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (12) TMI 467 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269163</link>
      <description>Section 23 of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 applies only where the assessee&#039;s own pending case before the assessing authority involves an identical question of law to another pending case of the same assessee before the High Court or Supreme Court; absent such a pending superior-court case, the procedure cannot be invoked and the request for liberty to file a declaration was rejected. A challenge to reassessment under section 19(20) also failed because the provision had already been upheld by a Division Bench, and that binding ruling governed the dispute. The writ petitions were dismissed and the reassessment orders were left intact.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=269163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>