<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (1) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175987</link>
    <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. The civil appeal was then dismissed on the facts and circumstances of the case, with no detailed legal reasoning or broader principle laid down. A contested question of law raised in the proceedings was expressly left open and not decided, preserving it for future consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 17:58:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (1) TMI 1168 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175987</link>
      <description>Delay in filing the appeal was condoned after the Court accepted the explanation, allowing the matter to be heard on merits. The civil appeal was then dismissed on the facts and circumstances of the case, with no detailed legal reasoning or broader principle laid down. A contested question of law raised in the proceedings was expressly left open and not decided, preserving it for future consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175987</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>