https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175986 Under the unified access regime, the classification turned on whether the subscriber terminal was premises-bound or capable of mobility across the SDCA. A fixed wireless access service required both the end-user terminal and network access point to remain fixed at the subscriber's premises, while mobility throughout the SDCA indicated limited mobility; on that basis, the Walky service was treated as limited mobility and remained subject to access deficit charges for the relevant period. The TRAI directive dated 4.3.2005 was held to be clarificatory, not amendatory, because it merely explained the pre-existing premises-specific restriction in the regulatory and licensing framework and did not alter licence terms. en-us Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 09 Dec 2015 22:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175986 Under the unified access regime, the classification turned on whether the subscriber terminal was premises-bound or capable of mobility across the SDCA. A fixed wireless access service required both the end-user terminal and network access point to remain fixed at the subscriber's premises, while mobility throughout the SDCA indicated limited mobility; on that basis, the Walky service was treated as limited mobility and remained subject to access deficit charges for the relevant period. The TRAI directive dated 4.3.2005 was held to be clarificatory, not amendatory, because it merely explained the pre-existing premises-specific restriction in the regulatory and licensing framework and did not alter licence terms. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175986