<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175974</link>
    <description>A preventive detention order was quashed in a criminal writ petition, with the High Court holding that the detenu&#039;s continued custody could not stand and directing immediate release forthwith. The impugned detention order dated 23 December 2010 was set aside in full, and the rule was made absolute. The decision reflects final judicial invalidation of the detention order on the petition challenging restraint of personal liberty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2017 13:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=408271" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 606 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175974</link>
      <description>A preventive detention order was quashed in a criminal writ petition, with the High Court holding that the detenu&#039;s continued custody could not stand and directing immediate release forthwith. The impugned detention order dated 23 December 2010 was set aside in full, and the rule was made absolute. The decision reflects final judicial invalidation of the detention order on the petition challenging restraint of personal liberty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=175974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>