<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1416</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that the value of scrap/waste retained by a job worker must be included in the value of the component manufactured if the conversion charges are affected by the retention and sale of scrap. The Court emphasized that the value of raw material and conversion charges are distinct, and adding the scrap value to conversion charges prevents double inclusion of costs. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment, which erroneously viewed including scrap value as double counting, was set aside. The Court reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order without imposing costs, reaffirming the significance of factoring in scrap value in manufacturing cost calculations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=40827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (3) TMI 17 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1416</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that the value of scrap/waste retained by a job worker must be included in the value of the component manufactured if the conversion charges are affected by the retention and sale of scrap. The Court emphasized that the value of raw material and conversion charges are distinct, and adding the scrap value to conversion charges prevents double inclusion of costs. The Tribunal&#039;s judgment, which erroneously viewed including scrap value as double counting, was set aside. The Court reinstated the adjudicating authority&#039;s order without imposing costs, reaffirming the significance of factoring in scrap value in manufacturing cost calculations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=1416</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>